Though gravitational pressure decreases as you go deeper, the force of the weight of material pressing down will be substantial down to a reasonable depth.
The 2 factors involved include:
1. The mass above the material in question.
2. The mass surrounding the material in question
At some point below the surface the increase of accumulated mass will be offset by the decreasing directional pull. It would seem that this point would be very close to the center, but who knows?

The main question is, can critical mass be achieved with the pressures available within the earth? Critical mass is the pressure at which nuclear reactions begin to take place. If earth has a nuclear reaction inside generating heat, the heat should continue be generated..
If critical mass isn't achievable, then the heat inside would be gradually dissipated letting the earth core cool. The diameter of the earth would decrease as the heat was lost due to thermal contraction.
The earth's crust would thicken as well.
Certainly, there isn't enough gravity near the core. The question is, is there enough anywhere. Probably not. So, the heat within the earth is dissipating into the atmosphere and the core is cooling. The core must also be contracting applying seismic pressure to the thin outer crust. The crust is already broken into "tectonic plates" with each pushing against each other causing earthquakes every time they move suddenly.
What is Gravity Anyway?
We seem to know all about gravity. But, what causes the force keeping us on our planet? Noone seems to have a definitive answer. One thing that prevents us from pinning down it's origin and understanding its cause is the problem of gravity's slipperiness, so to speak. We can't seem to define any way to alter its effects. You can't mask it's effects with known materials.
With light you can interfere with it in a multitude of ways. Colored glass, black cloth, mirrors, etc. allow us to test all sort of properties of light in controlled conditions and unravel how light works and understand the physics behind it. Unlike light, gravity cannot currently be created or distorted with electrical means. A thousand metal plates can be stacked on top of each other and gravity will act on the top plate the same way it acts on the bottom one.
Without ways of manipulating gravity, there is no way to test theories about it's source. All we can do is observe it's behavior and how it effects objects. There is a tight relationship between mass, inertia and gravity which suggests to me that neutrons may have a central roll in gravity's generation. If neutrons are the major players behind mass and inertia, maybe its because they are also behind gravity.
Could be as simple as that. Neutrons are'nt attracted to electrons or protons. Are they attracted to each other? Neutrons have no electrical "charge". Could they instead have a "gravitational charge" or affinity for each other.
Let's take this possibility a bit further. Could the presence of immense quantities of these "particles" produce a net effect of attracting other large bodies containing them?
Now, let's consider the phenomenum we refer to as, "inertia". Bodies containing lots of neutrons resist acceleration in any direction. This quality is "inertia". This is what keeps satellites in orbit around earth. Once they are set in motion in the vacuum of space, they will maintain their speed and distance above earth almost indefinitely.
Why is this so? Do atoms that have no neutrons resist acceleration? Hydrogen has no neutrons, but does exhibit inertia as far as i know. So, there goes the neutron theory anyway. |