Why Teaching Children Only Evolution is Intellectual Child Abuse

If you look real hard at the logic of the Nazis behind the “final solution”, you’ll see a regime that viewed some human beings as “lower” animals and themselves as more “highly evolved”. Modern science propogates the notion that non-religious intellectualism is a mark of a sort of more evolved mankind. People of faith are bullied, belittled, mocked and ridiculed on many “science” forums by university professors of evolution on a continual basis. In most of public education it’s Darwin’s way or the highway.

So, what about the highway? I will not recommend that parents send their children to college any more. Children are not animals, nor are they in any way part of the “animal kingdom”! Evolution theory has been thoroughly debunked by Creationists over the past 50 years and the “scientific establishment” has been working overtime to cover this up and has used it’s power and influence in the world to keep the truth about our creation and the love of God out of the classroom.

Why, because Darwin’s seductive ideas have convinced them that people of faith are “lesser evolved”? That mankind has “evolved” from “African stock” and other nonsense. The US constitution, and democracy in general. is founded on the “Self-evident truths… that all men are created equal…”.

Today, the “scientific establishment” is covering its butt by flooding the schools with supposed evidence to prop up Darwins evolution. As I’ve already said in many earlier posts, they give all sort of evidences of simple adaptation in nature and assert that it “proves” evolution. Actually, there is an enormous quantum leap from proving simple adaptation to supporting “common descent” which is the core supposition of darwin’s theory. Darwin’s infamous book, “The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life” focuses more on simple adaptation, its his less publicised and more dangerous books, “The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex” and “The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals” both work off the assumption that men were not created specially and seperately from the “animal kingdom”, but rather are the great grand children of apes and worms and such. Yes, they really teach your children that because that is what they want them to believe.

The only major group of students that have been spared by and large from this intellectual abuse are currently the “Home Schooled”. Home schooled students aren’t under the same pressures to conform to their peers’ standards or those of the “scientific establishment”. Homeschoolers are free to teach children the wonderful ways that our Creator has enabled His creatures to adapt to various environments and such without making it out to be a means of enabling all of the diversity of creatures to be their own creator as Darwin imagined.

If you want your children to have a healthy perspective on themselves and society as a whole, you would do them an enormous favor by keeping them out of public education at this time. I’m hoping that in the future their will be a full disclosure of the darwinian cover-up and that the thoroughly debunked notion of  “common-descent” will become just another failed chapter in the history of humanity when “science” once again put its bigfoot in its mouth.

Wayne Hollyoak

The Evolution of Madness

What is “evolutionism”? It’s the practice of  ignoring the reality that the true God of the Universe has created all things and replacing that with a false god referred to as “evolution”. Evolutionism is strange form of unintelligent natural creationism. The modern form of an old superstition that nature has in some way created itself. Therefore “evolutionism” is just a resurrection of  the dubious notion of “spontaneous generation”. However, in this new version of that concept, science is heralded, or should I say, blamed for this delusion.

This practice couldn’t have been much more poignantly clear to me than when I watched as the popular preacher of evolutionism, Richard Dawkins, declared glibly in a recent “Nova” TV show, that evolution did this as he stood alongside the enormous toothy jawbone of a sperm whale that’s on exhibit at a museum. That announcement came after a fascinating dissection of a real beached adult sperm whale. The point of the dissection of the “world’s largest living predator” was to display it’s wonderful design and how it is able to dive to the deepest parts of the ocean on a breath of air and feast on squid that it finds using its wonderfully sophisticated form of sonar.

Mr. Dawkins almost in the same breath qoutes a passage from the Bible from the book of Job that describes a creature in many ways like the sperm whale.(Dawkins makes no effort to inform the viewer that the context of the passage was that the Creator was asking Job where he was when God was designing His universe and placing all of His wonderfully made creatures on the earth.) 

There is another reference to this amazing creature in Psalms:
Psalms 104:24-35
” O LORD, how manifold are thy works! in wisdom hast thou made them all: the earth is full of thy riches. So is this great and wide sea, wherein are things creeping innumerable, both small and great beasts. There go the ships: there is that leviathan, whom thou hast made to play therein. These wait all upon thee; that thou mayest give them their meat in due season. That thou givest them they gather: thou openest thine hand, they are filled with good. Thou hidest thy face, they are troubled: thou takest away their breath, they die, and return to their dust. Thou sendest forth thy spirit, they are created: and thou renewest the face of the earth. The glory of the LORD shall endure for ever: the LORD shall rejoice in his works. He looketh on the earth, and it trembleth: he toucheth the hills, and they smoke. I will sing unto the LORD as long as I live: I will sing praise to my God while I have my being. My meditation of him shall be sweet: I will be glad in the LORD. Let the sinners be consumed out of the earth, and let the wicked be no more. Bless thou the LORD, O my soul. Praise ye the LORD.”

So, is Mr. Dawkins suddenly honoring the Bible as the Creator’s guide to His truth, or as an “interesting” piece of ancient “literature”? The more I read the Bible, the more I’m impressed by its power in revealing the reality of our real Creator’s wisdom, grace and majesty.  All of these concepts are totally foreign to “evolutionism” and those that preach it.

Wayne Hollyoak

Did Darwin fail or his proponents?

That’s a trick question I suppose. Actually, I think we all did. Darwin failed by drawing wild conclusions based on personal bias and ignorance. The death of one’schild can test a man’s faith and integrity. If that man is infuenced by other selfish men, any possible good he might do with his life can easily become a curse.

We all make errors in judgement. Even if it doesn’t seem as though we are influential, our decisions always impact others around us and those within the circles of each person they influence. Darwin had come to understand an interesting characteristic of the natural world. That is that living things can adapt to change in subtle ways by capitalizing on natural variability. He saw how this process of adaptation could work in detectable ways where there was a high degree of isolation on a creature from its ancestors. He supposed that that was the case at least, for he had no way to go back in time and see such a process take place. He just had the current living examples to compare.

Let’s say for a minute that what he concluded about those creatures living on those isolated islands was true. What does that say about creatures that don’t live in areas isolated from their ancestors? Did those different varieties of the creature always exist. Darwin knew of no way that new traits could be acquired since he had absolutely no understanding of genetics and how inheritence worked. As a pigeon breeder, he did know that the desired sorts of pigeon characteristics could only be maintained with carefull selective breeding practices. One of those is the carefull isolation of his desired types.

Darwin made up an entire creation story based on a few isolated speculative cases of adaptation.Was this honesty at work or the reaction of an angry man who decided that this was a way that he could justify his own bitterness? So he published his story to a world full of self-righteous people who wanted to see nature as self-created and thereby be excused from any responsibility to a real Creator. If ever there was a real opiate to the masses, it was Darwin’s tale of nature’s complete autonomy and its ability to create itself.

Darwin, being a clever story teller, used magic and conspiracy theory logic to win people over. What was his magic formula? A little bit of truth(adaptation) and some “slippery slope” logic. That is that time(thousands of years at least) the kind of time spans that keep anyone from actually verifying or debunking his theories.(which to some disqualifies any theory from being truly “scientific”). Slippery slope logic concludes that if something happens at a small scale, that eventually it will lead to a complete nullification of previously held contradictory belief.

Conspiracy theorists play on our insecurities and the fear of being someone’s fool. Darwin placed doubts in men’s minds about widely held understandings about where we came from and what our lives mean. He was taking aim at what He considered to be a corrupt and deceitful institution in spite of his reservations about a world of innocent people that might get caught in the crossfire.

People that abandon their faith in their Creator will find themselves groping blindly for reality and will latch onto anything that relieves the conscience. Drugs, alcohol, darwinism, anything that will relieve their anxiety about their confusion. To not recognize the enormous intelligence and careful and complex design existing in all of nature is a deathblow to the integrity of science and human thought.

Darwin attempted to undo basic logic with wild speculation about processes he had no understanding of. Which was the nature of inheritence to begin with. He gave no real consideration to the principles of cause and effect. By renaming “adaptation”, “natural selection” he elevated the status of what is really a very good design consideration to a creator of all things. He truly “started a joke that got the whole world crying” as the song writer once said. For this joke was no laughing matter. Darwin had fallen to his own pride and it’s the pride of those that have followed him that has kept his creation fantasy alive.

With all of the subsequent understanding of genetics crying foul and confirming the whealth of sophistication and engineering detail that really exists in the natural world- even to the minutest details of how atoms work, Darwin’s notion of a self-created natural world is still being sold to us as “fact”.

The real fact is that pride will always work foolishness in the hearts of people who fail to resist it.

Wayne Hollyoak